Meyersdale Windpower Facility

Photo Essay

Main | Landowners | Generation Holding Company | Florida Power and Light | Government and Agencies | SOAR

Contact

The Meyersdale facility was erected without adequate environmental impact studies. In the few years after the erection, over a thousand bats were killed each year. What was the owners of the turbines response? Their response was to ban Bat Conservation International from continued research, thereby preventing any further documentation of the slaughter of these very useful and important animals. Similar findings were observed in the migration patterns of golden eagles over this ridge which declined by 33% after erection of the Meyersdale Facility. Canada prohibits industrial wind turbines on ridge tops to protect migrating birds, and neighboring counties have enacted similar siting regulations. Somerset County has no siting regulations to protect migratory paths or scenic views. And no protection for the health consequences of turbines or property depreciation. And a review of recent sales near wind turbines will reveal that properties have depreciated, dramatically.

The Landowners:

Nathaniel Barbera, et al.: Turbines 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,17,19

Meyersdale Municipal Authority: Turbines 11,15,16,18

Ardith Murray: Turbine 20

Click below for documents related to the Meyersdale project:

Letter from Fish and Wildlife Service

Notice of Violations of Endangered Species Act

Don't let this happen in Berlin:

Above image courtesy of Dan Boone

 

Click below for National and International web pages for more information:

http://www.windaction.org/ | http://wind-watch.org/ | http://www.vawind.org/